Documentary film reviews have 
								become a regular offering of the 
								Zero Anthropology Magazine. In many if not 
								all cases, one aim is to bring a zero-anthropological perspective to the analysis of 
								the structure and contents of any given 
								documentary. In addition, the aim is to gather 
								insights and information from documentary 
								sources on topics that are of central concern to 
								the Zero Anthropology Project. 
								Documentaries, as valued cultural artefacts 
								circulated by dominant institutions through 
								influential media also provide us with a tool 
								for “studying up,” serving as a tool for 
								examining the reigning assumptions, ideologies, 
								and aesthetics of elites and brokers of 
								knowledge—that is at least one way we could 
								characterize documentaries that were funded by 
								corporations and wealthy philanthropic 
								foundations, narrated by celebrities, and 
								distributed by leading corporations. Other 
								documentaries, however, by being more or less 
								independent of the top layers of power, but 
								still speaking to large audiences, are also 
								useful tools for placing dominant beliefs in 
								bold relief, and they can be useful by giving us 
								a sense of the range of ideas, information, and 
								debates that drive contemporary arguments about 
								power. Documentaries can thus be “read” as key 
								ethnographic documents of contemporary, 
								large-scale mass mediated society.
								
								What makes our reviews unique is the 
								exhaustively detailed and structured analysis of 
								each film that shares with readers enough 
								information to make sense of the film, and to 
								learn whatever the film has to offer. Rarely is 
								a review published without having viewed a given 
								film four times, or more. The slow, deliberate, 
								and systematic nature of the review process 
								allows time to challenge and revise initial 
								impressions, and to draw new associations and 
								raise questions that were not salient from a 
								single viewing. The result is a review 
								that can complement the film, and stand on its 
								own as a source of information and analysis.
								
								Zero Anthropology does not receive payment 
								from filmmakers in return for a review. 
								Typically, films reviewed are those that can be 
								accessed through the library system, or that are 
								freely available for public viewing online. The 
								Internet Movie Database is an essential tool for 
								researching which films have been made on a 
								given topic.
								
								Ethnographic films are not barred from review; 
								they will be reviewed if or when they become 
								relevant to the study of imperialism or any of 
								the other major areas of interest, and they must 
								be easy to access for anyone. Reviews in the  
								Zero Anthropology Magazine include 
								categories such as: war and geopolitics; 
								political economy; political analysis; cyberwar; 
								religion; and, ecology among others. The date of the last edit here was 
								July 1, 
								2019.
								
								
								
2019. “Google’s 
								Empire: The Science Fiction of Power”. Zero Anthropology, 
								June 28.
2019. “Cyber-Terrorism: 
								How the US and Israel Attacked Iran—and Failed”. Zero Anthropology, 
								June 25.
2019. “Brexitannia: 
								The Faces and Voices of Brexit”. Zero Anthropology, 
								May 23.
2019. “America: 
								Imagine an America without Her”. Zero Anthropology, 
								May 5.
2019. “On 
								Duty for the CIA: German Nazis and Italian 
								Fascists”. Zero Anthropology, 
								March 29.
2019. “What 
								are the Prospects for a US War with China?” Zero Anthropology, 
								February 9.
2019. “Ghost 
								Exchange: Complexity, Velocity, and Risk”. Zero Anthropology, 
								January 29.
2018. “The 
								War of the Public Intellectuals: A Review of 
								‘Best of Enemies: Buckley vs. Vidal’ (2015)”. Zero Anthropology, 
								December 2.
2018. “‘Cocaine 
								Cowboys: Reloaded’ (2014): Reversing Empire and 
								the 1980s’ Drug War”. Zero Anthropology, 
								October 28.
2018. “Robert 
								Reich’s ‘Inequality for All’: A Documentary 
								Review”. Zero Anthropology, 
								July 29.
								
								2018. “‘One 
								Day This Door is Going to Open’: A Review of 
								‘Dennis Rodman’s Big Bang in Pyongyang’ 
								(Documentary)”. Zero Anthropology, 
								June 10.
2018. “Documentary 
								Review: ‘Inside Job’ is Still Relevant”. Zero Anthropology, 
								May 25.
2018. “Documentary 
								Review: ‘The China Hustle’ is a Problematic 
								Cautionary Tale”. Zero Anthropology, 
								May 3.
2016. “6 
								Documentaries for the 2016 US Presidential 
								Election”. Zero Anthropology, 
								November 6.
2016. “Review 
								of a Film by Michael Moore: ‘Where to Invade 
								Next’ (2016)”. Zero Anthropology, 
								May 25.
2014. “Resistance, 
								Rupture, and Repair: The Story of the Caribs of 
								St. Vincent”. Zero Anthropology, 
								August 21.
2013. “What 
								is the society you are dreaming of?” Zero Anthropology, 
								July 16.
2013. “Landscapes 
								of Emergency”. Zero Anthropology, 
								July 15.